I had a look and indeed they are *very* pricey. Messages sorted by: > also want to investigate Fujitsu scanners, they are pricey, but they> give me protocol documentation for most of their models, and so areThanks. Next message: Samsung M2070 It offers high quality 2400 dpi optical resolution with true 48-bit color scanning.
But such names> are not used for this mustek product).> Would anyone know if that is actually a different naming for another> scanner in the Sane list, or is it simply not in the list? And if it> is not, would anyone know if it would work anyway, has any experience> Also what seems to be the officiel spec:> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org> -> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian. This is indeed annoying!> In their Support Drivers Downloads they don't specify bit size for Linux> Technical Support is tsupport at mustek.com> -> I have been looking at Mustek for awhile - more or less limited by the> Do you know of other good brands which make A3 scanners? Good quality> but reasonable price is what I am looking for.> I've been interested into a A3 scanner, found the Mustek A3 2400S on> but I just can't figure out whether or not it is supported on Linux> But no model seems to be exactly named "2400S" (there are a lot of> an additional naming like BearPaw, ScanExpress, etc. Now they don't really give much information on how faster it> would be (only comparison point is A3 200 dpi in 2.3 s for the HS, and> 3 s for the N model, no info for higher resolutions).> Perhaps they are not really that serious about the Linux 32 bit?> Oh I didn't realize the 32 bit part. While Mustek scanners are in theHundreds of EUR range, the Fujitsu are in the thousands range.Maybe they are a lot better though, and if they give documentation areFLOSS-friendly, but my current wallet would not allow me to buy these.For information, I contacted Mustek, and they confirmed me that allTheir scanners are compatible with Linux, even A3 2400S, which is notThey also told me that the front button won't be supported on LinuxRight now though, so the advantage of models such as A3F1200N/A3F2400NI sent another email asking about the 32/64 bit part, since I hadn'tNoticed this when I first sent the email.> On Wed, at 8:54 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:> In the specifications under 'System Requirements' it shows:> Windows 8 / 7 / Vista / XP (Service Pack 3)> Linux Ubuntu12.04 kernel 3.11 32bit / Fedora 20 kernel 3.15 32bit> Yes after sending this email to the Sane mailing list, I checked other> scanners and discovered as well that some had announced Linux support,> Rather than the A3F2400N though, the A3 1200 HS looks interesting by> being faster, which I prefer to having buttons on the scanner, as long> as this does not affect the scan quality (there is also a A3 2400 HS> in their webshop, apparently so recently released that it is not even> in the main website, but honestly I think 1200 dpi is more than> enough).
0 kommentar(er)
